Amazon, Netflix Is ​​designed To Move Quickly Switch To Digital Media In Physics

Amazon is a prime Android tablet, which is likely to be funded by sales of digital media. Netflix customers bitten out of the fragmentation of streaming and DVD by mail services, effectively higher prices. Red wire: Both companies seek to accelerate the transition to digital broadcasting media.

Amazon tablet that is said and reported for months. The Wall Street Journal confirms Amazon tablet is coming. Kindle e-book on the tap and the Amazon, which is much preferred to deliver the book for you that wirelessly through the mail. Why? Is it cheaper on Amazon, and you get instant gratification. What's not to love?

Netflix and discontent, it really shows some signs of death down in the lineup is finally shipping the DVD of the subscriber pays. And if some of you drop DVD streaming service Netflix is ​​just swell. After all, profit margins are much better. The future of Netflix streaming delivery is DVD. By dividing the services and manage their Netflix is ​​essentially a swarm of slow growth, expensive. From the standpoint of numbers, the movement Neflix makes sense, no amount of screaming customers.

That the impact of the Kindle is magnified with the tablet. Amazon sells the tablet will help you in your movies, TV shows, music, books, and some applications. This model is definitely better to pack the DVD and hardcover books for delivery. For Amazon, the supply of digital media means higher margins, lower costs, and maybe a couple of re-distribution centers, which can be used for other assets.

Barclays analyst Anthony DiClemente nails his research note. He said that the tablet is the Amazon strategy of significant risks and wires, but the size of the business reasons for acting. Clement said:

One tablet will help offset future declines in cases of physical media such as changes in physical media to digital (media accounted for 40% of sales in 1Q11). All material is often a lower margin business and the market becomes more competitive tablet, we mean a further boost tablet Amazon Amazon offers digital and Appstore. Amazon has had great success with the Kindle and its strategy app multiple mobile platforms to date as it now sells more books Kindle books and physical growth of trade in Amazon National Book in units and dollars is the fastest for over 10 years.

READ MORE - Amazon, Netflix Is ​​designed To Move Quickly Switch To Digital Media In Physics

Anonymous FBI Challenge: To Launch A Broad Front Group Distribution Network Hacking

Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation conducted a series of raids on Tuesday in an ongoing investigation of this person, group of piracy. But the challenges to the signing of a distribution ring are enormous.

CBS News has learned that FBI agents conducted raids Tuesday in New York houses. PCs and devices were taken under search warrants. Two houses were on Long Island with two others in Brooklyn and the Bronx. CBS News has also confirmed that the raids were conducted in California and 14 arrests were made so far.

Related: FBI made 14 arrests in raids anonymous

Overall, it is more than a dozen raids taking place in the United States is "a major police operation," according to CBS News. Now these searches related to the raid.

The purpose of these raids was to hunt down the pirates who have carried out attacks on businesses and public places.

Fox News reports said the first attacks. As Don Reisinger at CNET News has noted, the FBI has had some success against anonymous members and more than 40 search warrants for the group.

The big challenge is that law enforcement plays a game of Whac-A-Mole. As new members are targeting others think. Hacking groups such as anonymous and spin-offs, as LulzSec-through design is decentralized. You cut off the head, or what you think is the main and the other regenerates.

Scotland Yard last month was arrested Ryan Cleary, 19 years, in relation to several attacks in London, the agency of serious crime in Britain. Problem: LulzSec rang his Twitter account, that the arrest was unjustified. However, LulzSec then went silent, until it is attacked by Rupert Murdoch's giggles Sun newspaper site

Michael Chertoff, former Department of Homeland Security's security chief, said last month that the great challenge of the fight against piracy group assignment. In a decentralized group there are different flavors of bad. The FBI has launched a series of bad actors and partners on servers in the hope of getting a great result.

Chertoff said:

"We say we do not know who had the evil intention, but can not locate the server, which is a weapon against us? Let the server in real life or in cyberspace? There will be a clear line, and you can take the server areas outside of physics and computer science. "

The puzzle is similar to the struggle of a terrorist network, where you have to cast a wide net to get traction against anonymity.

In this sense, the FBI raids on Tuesday is the latest installment of what is likely to be a continuing series of attempts to derail the group Anonymous, and so on.

READ MORE - Anonymous FBI Challenge: To Launch A Broad Front Group Distribution Network Hacking

10 Reasons Why Google Plus Enterprising People

There are a lot of to-fro-ING ING around if Google Plus is suitable for the company. Some colleagues are afraid that Google is moving too fast, others that it was moving too slowly. Any position can not be denied that the G + Topsy increases. And an enterprising developers will find ways to exploit it for their own purposes.

Weekend, I suggested to the President and CEO Loic Lemeur Seesmic might be an idea to find out if someone Salesforce.com community might be interested to hear early versions of G + on Seesmic. My thought was that if he could not Seesmic enough interest so that it can serve as a way to bring together a group at an early stage of the solution for testers. This is essentially what Google calls the G Plussers to do and a good impression.

Lemeur sent a properly worded and voila, within two hours he had over 60 positive responses - see chart:

 

Note the time. My time is 7:33 and 6:33 PST 22:33 GMT, 09:34 my time, after midnight in the valley. There are a number of conclusions can be drawn from the interim:

First People read posts by G + at these times will probably be the most invested in its success. This is the beginning, the early adopters now, but could be an army of people in time to come.

2. Quantity "Reply", assuming that all G Loic is + 20 000 "followers" are responsible for 0.3%. Because the response rate, my 0.3% is likely to be inaccurate, the conservative side. Regardless, I suggest that it is not shabby compared to the mass mailings, or other outmoded forms of "advertising".

3. It is a good bet that all the defendants are what the advertisers of the term "pre-qualified."

4. Lemeur, how people can benefit from the force multiplier, they built the past through the careful use of blogs, Facebook, Twitter and other social tools of large size. The two most important benefit from and add value to what has gone before, even if the ultimate form of shiny new thing.

5. Although Google probably thinking, especially because he has brought the advertising business model, enterprising individuals and organizations to understand the developer can also bathe in the glow of G +. Right now, it seems that the individual rather than the brand, which is preceding the performance.

6. People benefit from this because they are not advertising itself, but to invite those who are in a conversation based on your needs. Google will not be able to stop this activity because it is not advertising in the conventional sense or how to build your model.

7. It is possible that Google could develop a type of billing mechanism for this type of activity, but would not make much sense and is likely to draw resentment. Therefore, it is likely that those who can benefit from this way will be a free-range market.

Marks 8th will be left scratching their heads wondering if they can reproduce the same. They can, but it becomes a hell of a job. The last person I saw how successful Robert Scoble when he worked for Microsoft, which he has since continued to repeat at Rackspace.

9th Lemeur proved that with a highly focused and invested "more" of the group, you can get good results at almost zero cost.

10th Not everyone can be a Lemeur or Scoble, but there is enough in all areas so that they become ambassadors for the future - whether they do or what they represent. It is powerful enough stop.

I missed something important?

Note: when I wrote this in my machine - Lemeur had a second clutch of positive respondents. Will someone let me know when it reaches 100?

READ MORE - 10 Reasons Why Google Plus Enterprising People

Five Linux Contributor: Microsoft

Dogs and cats, apples and oranges, Linux and Microsoft. Two of these three things do not go well together. We believe that Microsoft, so Microsoft was the fifth largest contributor to the upcoming 3.0 Linux kernel? Believe.

In the history of Linux Weekly News, is currently only available to subscribers, an analysis of Linux 3.0 of the respondents revealed that Microsoft was the fifth largest corporate supporter of Linux 3.0. Although only the 15h general, which still bears behind only Microsoft, Red Hat, Intel, Novell and IBM to promote a new code for the Linux version.

To be exact, Microsoft developer K. Srinivasan and gets credit for helping to improve Linux. Of course, as you can imagine, neither Microsoft nor Srinivasan doing this for all the special love Linux Tor itself.

The vast majority of the contributions of Microsoft was its own Hyper-V virtualization hypervisor drivers. Hyper-V is Microsoft 64-bit system based virtualization hypervisor. This is Microsoft's response to Linux and VMware Kernel-based Virtualization Manager K (KVM).

Microsoft wants you to see that it is possible Linux to run two instances of Server 2008 R2 and Windows Server 2008 R2 to run instances of Linux with their own tools virtualizaton. Microsoft has been working on this for some time with Novell, SUSE today.

Initially, the source code was not open to everyone, but in 2009 it was discovered that some code was already in the GPL Linux drivers Hyper-V. Thus, "In a break from the ordinary, Microsoft has released 20,000 lines of code device driver for the Linux community. The code, which includes three device drivers for Linux, was presented to the Linux kernel community for inclusion in the Linus tree. The drivers are available for the Linux community and customers, and improve performance when virtualized Linux operating system in Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V Windows Server 2008 R2 or Hyper-V. "

It helped, of course, Microsoft still reluctantly was forced to work with Linux to try to maintain their market share. As Matt Asay, a senior executive of open source and the author said at the time, "The news reflects Microsoft's continued interest in virtualization lobotomizing competition with low prices, but also a recognition that it should open if it is to counter strategies of the insurgents virtualization Red Hat, Novell and others in the field of open source. "

In the months after that, although Microsoft has done little to improve their code. In fact Greg Kroah-Hartman, who oversees the intermediate code for the Linux kernel, sometimes complained that "[Microsoft] developers seem to have disappeared again, it gets old," and threatened to remove the code from Linux.

Microsoft has apparently finally got the message. In recent months, they worked hard to improve the Hyper-V and Linux interoperability.

This may not be the last, and it's really just Microsoft's own objectives, but now Microsoft, yes Microsoft is a leading contributor to Linux. Now, in these days of miracles, let me see if I can get my dog ​​to stop barking at my neighbors cats.

READ MORE - Five Linux Contributor: Microsoft

It Is Time For Google To Take Control Of Android

One of the reasons for Android is growing, as the mobile platform in the history of the open nature of the operating system. OEMs, developers and buyers flocked to the platform, which allows you to change the whole line, will create an opportunity for everyone to make Android look and act in many ways. Laxity and the Android platform is its biggest draw, but there is such a thing as too much transparency, and has begun to affect customers in ways that certainly did not intend to go to Google.

Mrs. Scott, Raymond wrote a rant that emphasizes how users of this opening is biting where it hurts. His problems with the card Samsung Galaxy 10.1 was due to Samsung's decision to change the core code Android in a way that violated the board's ability to communicate with back-end servers of Google. Read this topic again, and then read Scott's book in its entirety to fully understand what is happening with Android.

Breaking Android: Who is worse, Google or suppliers?

Scott takes the whole situation is understandable Tab, wonders if the problem is Samsung or Google. Take mine, it's easier, I put the blame directly to the Google platform for owners of the shoulders. It is not an OEM should be able to replace the code behind the Android kernel for some reason. And 'possible to have an open platform like Android OS core functionality still remains blocked. So, Google should have done from the beginning, but the way he approached the loose Android is not successful.

I am using Android phones, and tablets from the start, the more I love. They work well for most of the time, and is a joy to use. That is, until something goes wrong, and how Scott found is usually the result of a Google partner, going to a special device that jams up the pipes.

I always suspected that this was the case, and has been shown to me when I moved 4G Samsung Nexus S recently. Nexus S is the flagship phone from Google, and as such, it ignores all of the adjustments in favor of the Samsung store on Android. This has led to a better user experience than I had tried all other Android devices. Operation of the phone is perfect, and the performance is stellar in every way.

It makes sense that Google uses to test Nexus S Android built before the release. The device does not change to fill the job of OEM and Android works perfectly as a result. This shows the benefits of blocking major parts of the operating system Android, Google is desperate to do something. The user experience varies greatly between Android devices that are not in favor of Google, and eventually turn against him.

I have ranted before about the need for Google to take control of Android in regard to system updates and what remains unchanged. While the opening of the platform requires the participation of others in the upgrade process, Google has not yet taken control of how they are made to better serve the owners of Android devices.

Google has admitted that it was, and announced the formation of the coalition of the largest operators of I / O conference Google a little 'back. The sole purpose of this coalition is to ensure that Google runs the Android update to ensure that purchasers of devices with OS can not be sure how and when they reach the system updates. Unfortunately, while smacking good intentions, nothing is heard of these improvements, the time of notification.

My favorite is always compressed original Samsung Galaxy Tab I bought from Sprint. It is a pill that has become a good, even better when Sprint has recently released a major update that improves gingerbread. Unfortunately, those who bought the Galaxy tab other Google partners are waiting for this update, further evidence of the damaged system.

Time has passed, the good intentions. Owners of Google Android devices will need to take control and make things work properly. Keep an open platform has a role, but to block key parts of the operating system to allow the parties in line. Customers will thank you.

READ MORE - It Is Time For Google To Take Control Of Android

Windows 8 Tablets And The Nightmare Security Updates

A Windows to manage them all. This is the message coming loud and clear on the Microsoft Windows 8 The company intends to get the next version of Windows that runs on all types of devices, from desktops to tablets. Many who see the Windows is already questioning how it would work, and I am firmly in the camp. When I think of Windows 8 is running on tablets, the complete according to Microsoft Windows, the more I see problems, especially when I think of safety issues that come with Windows and regular updates of these requirements. I do not think it will work with devices for additional consumption in tablet form.

I understand the need for constant updating in order to protect Windows users from the bad guys are not the fault of Microsoft. It has never been. The platform has been a target for malware makers because it is so great. Unfortunately, even if they are not Microsoft's fault, it is still an ingrained part of the Windows ecosystem. If you use Windows, you should schedule regular updates to keep safe. Windows 8 will be the same as any previous version of Windows. Therein lies the rub with devices such as tablets.

The tablets are not the primary systems that owners always want to use. They use systems that are picked up from time to time to do something online or deal with any content. Pick up the tablet, do what you need, then he asked again. Use the scenario has no room for security updates frequently. The first time you download a Windows 8 tablets do something quickly, only to discover that the upgrade to be used or downloaded in the background, you will be frustrated that you can not do what you do. They can set up so you can expose the update, but that makes you vulnerable at best, and the need to allow time for updates that are used in the worst case. Maintenance will be a constant element of Windows 8 and property owners will not like tablets.

Windows Update can configure the application in the middle of the night you say, which minimizes the impact of using tablets in the future. The problem is that the tablets do not correspond to this scenario, the bar owners will tell you they are not necessarily connect them every night due to battery life. Or if they do, and a security update comes in while the tablet is sitting away from load, which can bring other problems. The first morning, you take the tablet Windows 8, the burden of doing something and find the machine reboots during the night to complete an upgrade, will be frustrated. Especially because, like most pickup owners who have left to run multiple applications simultaneously on standby and maybe your job is not registered for the upgrade. Losing your job now is a very bad thing to have to recreate a work session is not fun.

The tablets are used differently from other computers and a full 8 on Windows, with all the overhead that will provide maintenance, will not be competitive. Tablets run mobile operating systems not to fast, and it is a great advantage for homeowners. They are always on, always ready to pick up where the owner has stopped, because the OS has no regular maintenance requirements. Windows 8 will never be free of the need for security and there will be a negative impact on the owners.

READ MORE - Windows 8 Tablets And The Nightmare Security Updates

Microsoft Offers $ 250,000 Reward Information Rustock Botnets

Today we are taking the exercise further. After the publication of notices in the two Russian newspapers last month, notify the actors of Rustock civil case, we decided to expand our discovery efforts to identify those responsible for civilian control of the botnet from the famous Rustock cash reward of $ 250 000 new information that leads to the arrest of identification and conviction of the person in question (s).

The Rustock botnet is responsible for much of cybercrime, spam (the botnet has a capacity of 30 million messages a day), tricks of dubious pharmaceuticals counterfeit and pirated software.

Size Rustock botnet has already been cut in half, but still leaves hundreds of thousands of systems under its control. In order to down the entire botnet Microsoft is now facing the legal system.

So if you have information ... Well, you can earn a few dollars.

READ MORE - Microsoft Offers $ 250,000 Reward Information Rustock Botnets

A Notice Calling Facebook: NYT Says Google Gets + Privacy Rights

I was not surprised to see a complete redesign of the Facebook privacy settings quickly - especially now that the New York Times gave a one-up Google + Facebook when it comes to the privacy options.

Privacy issues still - or maybe it's just the control over what is shared that really matter. This is something that facebookers founder Mark Zuckerberg said, again and again, usually in a riot at a new feature comes on Facebook, and personal settings are tuned for more sharing. Squawk users, Facebook and adjusts settings to apologize and all is forgiven. After all, it's not as if there was a Facebook-like other place where people can go out and socialize on the Internet.

Until now.

Also: Mark Zuckerberg: Facebook users' privacy in general, more anxious

Within a month, Google + exploded, now 10 million members and growing. There were some comments on Facebook from people in my network. And many of them begin to appear in Google +, adding that their circles me. Even my wife, who spends a good amount of time connecting with family and friends in FB, when asked about Google + Saturday. We have created an account and at the time Monday morning came around, their network of circles and was growing.

My wife, who usually takes their privacy settings of Facebook - as well as her list of friends - very seriously, was initially skeptical about Google +. Do not really like the idea that does not need to ask a friend or accept a friend, and he was comfortable with anyone seeing her picture, status updates and other messages.

But then, when it sank in: Google began to realize that share specific media was actually a "better way" (his words, not mine) of the display of things. It is the only recognized that this form of sharing + Google was better than having to go and mess with all these settings in Facebook.

Now, none of this is to say that Facebook will move on a path MySpace soon. My wife has built a strong network of people in CA and even she said that, without some of his Facebook friends basic + Google was a bit boring. Certainly, it will not stop to connect to Facebook on a regular basis.

However, this will call for yet another warning to Facebook. Google sends a strong message and clear that Facebook is no longer the only game in town. And take time to resolve sticking points that have long existed in Facebook - such as privacy - will only make Google + looks so much more attractive.

Which brings me back to my prediction that if the privacy settings, I do not at all surprised to see Facebook becomes a kind of simplification of these parameters. Of course, this means that the leader is following the new man on the block.

But it must be better than in the wake of MySpace.

READ MORE - A Notice Calling Facebook: NYT Says Google Gets + Privacy Rights

DoD: 24000 Files Scanned In March From Military Contractor Systems

Department of Defense Deputy Secretary of State William Lynn said that 24,000 cases were taken in March from military contractor systems. Data leakage is more common in the military complex. The good news? The DoD has a plan to raise its defenses.

Lynn did not give details on the attack or the contractor. Published Thursday DoD's strategy to use in cyberspace.

The strategy boils down to:

* Treating cyberspace as an area to organize, train and equip the military.

* Implementation of the new concepts of operation for the defense to protect military systems.

* Partner with departments and the private sector.

* Work with allies to improve security.

* Leverage U.S. technical skill and innovation.

Lynn, who also spoke extensively on cyber security and cooperation with the Department of Homeland Security, said that the intrusions are relatively common and that the stolen data ranges from the mundane to the Joint Strike fighter designs.

Here's what Lynn said in context:

Critical infrastructure of the army depends also includes private companies that build equipment and technology that we use. Their network could provide valuable information on our weapons systems and capabilities. The theft of design data and technical information within these networks, undermining the technological edge we have on potential adversaries.

This is a major concern in the past ten years, terabytes of data have been extracted by foreign intruders corporate networks of defense companies. In an intrusion that in March alone, 24,000 cases were taken.

When you look at all intrusions in recent years, some of the stolen data is secular, such as specifications for small pieces of tanks, planes and submarines. But a lot of it relates to our most vulnerable, including air avionics, surveillance technologies, satellite communication systems and network security protocols. Cyber ​​abuse is committed against a broad overlap in the defense industry, a route crucial for military equipment, ranging from missile-tracking and satellite navigation devices is a UAV and the Joint Strike Fighter.

Cons: the measures have not stopped the flow of sensitive information. We must do more to protect our digital store design innovation.

The biggest question: How DoD design systems that are at the heart of course, when the Pentagon is more related to private contractors?

At this point, Lynn said, DoD and DHS has established a pilot program to share classified information to better protect networks. This "Industrial Data Base" is a pilot effort to share information that revolves around the government, entrepreneurs and Internet service providers. The general theme: give information for businesses and engineers who know how to defend a network.

Lynn said that the government "did not follow-up, arrest or the rescue of private communications". In contrast, groups share the intelligence of a threat so that companies can defend themselves. The pilot is voluntary.

Will it succeed? Lynn said that preliminary results are promising. "Although just beginning to evaluate the effectiveness of the pilot, who has already made the intrusion of some members of the industry in question. And through the exchange of information helps the driver not only stopped the intrusion. Also we learned more about the diversity of techniques used in the commission, "said Lynn.

The government and private sector cooperation in security is a theme that was also mentioned by DHS, Michael Chertoff, former head during a speech in New York. Chertoff urged the public-private cooperation to defend against the likes of pirate groups like Anonymous.

One thing is clear the U.S. military complex needs to strengthen its network security. In the operational strategy of the DoD cyberspace, the military is very clear about how much it depends on cyberspace. From the report:

Along with other U.S. Government, Department of Defense (DoD), depends on the work in cyberspace. It 'difficult to exaggerate this dependence, the DoD manages more than 15,000 networks, and seven million of computer equipment in hundreds of plants in dozens of countries around the world. DoD to use cyberspace to its military, intelligence and operations, including movement of personnel and materials as well as command and control of the entire spectrum of military operations.

Which of the following phases, the DoD said to conclude the following with respect to its computer defenses:

* Improved the "best cyber hygiene".

* A focus on internal threats through the communication of effective control and accountability and information management.

* Enable "active defense capability computing" to prevent intrusion.

* To develop new network architectures.

READ MORE - DoD: 24000 Files Scanned In March From Military Contractor Systems