There are a lot of to-fro-ING ING around if Google Plus is suitable for the company. Some colleagues are afraid that Google is moving too fast, others that it was moving too slowly. Any position can not be denied that the G + Topsy increases. And an enterprising developers will find ways to exploit it for their own purposes.
Weekend, I suggested to the President and CEO Loic Lemeur Seesmic might be an idea to find out if someone Salesforce.com community might be interested to hear early versions of G + on Seesmic. My thought was that if he could not Seesmic enough interest so that it can serve as a way to bring together a group at an early stage of the solution for testers. This is essentially what Google calls the G Plussers to do and a good impression.
Lemeur sent a properly worded and voila, within two hours he had over 60 positive responses - see chart:
Weekend, I suggested to the President and CEO Loic Lemeur Seesmic might be an idea to find out if someone Salesforce.com community might be interested to hear early versions of G + on Seesmic. My thought was that if he could not Seesmic enough interest so that it can serve as a way to bring together a group at an early stage of the solution for testers. This is essentially what Google calls the G Plussers to do and a good impression.
Lemeur sent a properly worded and voila, within two hours he had over 60 positive responses - see chart:
Note the time. My time is 7:33 and 6:33 PST 22:33 GMT, 09:34 my time, after midnight in the valley. There are a number of conclusions can be drawn from the interim:
First People read posts by G + at these times will probably be the most invested in its success. This is the beginning, the early adopters now, but could be an army of people in time to come.
2. Quantity "Reply", assuming that all G Loic is + 20 000 "followers" are responsible for 0.3%. Because the response rate, my 0.3% is likely to be inaccurate, the conservative side. Regardless, I suggest that it is not shabby compared to the mass mailings, or other outmoded forms of "advertising".
3. It is a good bet that all the defendants are what the advertisers of the term "pre-qualified."
4. Lemeur, how people can benefit from the force multiplier, they built the past through the careful use of blogs, Facebook, Twitter and other social tools of large size. The two most important benefit from and add value to what has gone before, even if the ultimate form of shiny new thing.
5. Although Google probably thinking, especially because he has brought the advertising business model, enterprising individuals and organizations to understand the developer can also bathe in the glow of G +. Right now, it seems that the individual rather than the brand, which is preceding the performance.
6. People benefit from this because they are not advertising itself, but to invite those who are in a conversation based on your needs. Google will not be able to stop this activity because it is not advertising in the conventional sense or how to build your model.
7. It is possible that Google could develop a type of billing mechanism for this type of activity, but would not make much sense and is likely to draw resentment. Therefore, it is likely that those who can benefit from this way will be a free-range market.
Marks 8th will be left scratching their heads wondering if they can reproduce the same. They can, but it becomes a hell of a job. The last person I saw how successful Robert Scoble when he worked for Microsoft, which he has since continued to repeat at Rackspace.
9th Lemeur proved that with a highly focused and invested "more" of the group, you can get good results at almost zero cost.
10th Not everyone can be a Lemeur or Scoble, but there is enough in all areas so that they become ambassadors for the future - whether they do or what they represent. It is powerful enough stop.
I missed something important?
Note: when I wrote this in my machine - Lemeur had a second clutch of positive respondents. Will someone let me know when it reaches 100?
First People read posts by G + at these times will probably be the most invested in its success. This is the beginning, the early adopters now, but could be an army of people in time to come.
2. Quantity "Reply", assuming that all G Loic is + 20 000 "followers" are responsible for 0.3%. Because the response rate, my 0.3% is likely to be inaccurate, the conservative side. Regardless, I suggest that it is not shabby compared to the mass mailings, or other outmoded forms of "advertising".
3. It is a good bet that all the defendants are what the advertisers of the term "pre-qualified."
4. Lemeur, how people can benefit from the force multiplier, they built the past through the careful use of blogs, Facebook, Twitter and other social tools of large size. The two most important benefit from and add value to what has gone before, even if the ultimate form of shiny new thing.
5. Although Google probably thinking, especially because he has brought the advertising business model, enterprising individuals and organizations to understand the developer can also bathe in the glow of G +. Right now, it seems that the individual rather than the brand, which is preceding the performance.
6. People benefit from this because they are not advertising itself, but to invite those who are in a conversation based on your needs. Google will not be able to stop this activity because it is not advertising in the conventional sense or how to build your model.
7. It is possible that Google could develop a type of billing mechanism for this type of activity, but would not make much sense and is likely to draw resentment. Therefore, it is likely that those who can benefit from this way will be a free-range market.
Marks 8th will be left scratching their heads wondering if they can reproduce the same. They can, but it becomes a hell of a job. The last person I saw how successful Robert Scoble when he worked for Microsoft, which he has since continued to repeat at Rackspace.
9th Lemeur proved that with a highly focused and invested "more" of the group, you can get good results at almost zero cost.
10th Not everyone can be a Lemeur or Scoble, but there is enough in all areas so that they become ambassadors for the future - whether they do or what they represent. It is powerful enough stop.
I missed something important?
Note: when I wrote this in my machine - Lemeur had a second clutch of positive respondents. Will someone let me know when it reaches 100?
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar